Recently in court I was asked by an attorney what the 'specific law' was that defined the term 'bona fide' concerning the Dr/Pt relationship. I mentioned HB 4851 and the medical board standards for the bona fide Dr/Pt relationship and was corrected by the attorney. These were not actual laws she said, one was a recommendation by the medical board, the other was a bill.
The question was in response to the characterization of a 'certification clinic event' where no physician was in contact with the patients and my contention that this didn't qualify as a 'Bona Fide' Dr/Pt relationship. I discussed the Michigan Medical Marijuana Act, and I discussed the Medical Practice Act (which is the legal basis of medicine in Michigan). While the court sided with me overall, this question was not resolved.
Obviously, this issue has been at the forefront of list of 'grey areas' within the MMMA over the last couple of years. After reflecting some more on the question, I think I've come up with an answer....